Are we all Slaves? (excerpt from Robert Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia)

The Tale of the Slave

This is an excerpt from Robert Nozick‘s Anarchy, State, and Utopia, (1974, 290-292). I love the thought-provoking question he is raising in this little story.

“Consider the following sequence of cases… and imagine it is about you.

  1. There is a slave completely at the mercy of his brutal master’s whims. He often is cruelly beaten, called out in the middle of the night, and so on.
  2. The master is kindlier and beats the slave only for stated infractions of his rules (not fulfilling the work quota, and so on). He gives the slave some free time.
  3. The master has a group of slaves, and he decides how things are to be allocated among them on nice grounds, taking into account their needs, merit, and so on.
  4. The master allows his slaves four days on their own and requires them to work only three days a week on his land. The rest of the time is their own.
  5. The master allows his slaves to go off and work in the city (or anywhere they wish) for wages. He requires only that they send back to him three-sevenths of their wages. He also retains the power to recall them to the plantation if some emergency threatens his land; and to raise or lower the three-sevenths amount required to be turned over to him. He further retains the right to restrict the slaves from participating in certain dangerous activities that threaten his financial return, for example, mountain climbing, cigarette smoking.
  6. The master allows all of his 10,000 slaves, except you, to vote, and the joint decision is made by all of them. There is open discussion, and so forth, among them, and they have the power to determine to what uses to put whatever percentage of your (and their) earnings they decide to take; what activities legitimately may be forbidden to you, and so on.
  7. Though still not having the vote, you are at liberty (and are given the right) to enter into the discussions of the 10,000, to try to persuade them to adopt various policies and to treat you and themselves in a certain way. They then go off to vote to decide upon policies covering the vast range of their powers.
  8. In appreciation of your useful contributions to discussion, the 10,000 allow you to vote if they are deadlocked; they commit themselves to this procedure. After the discussion you mark your vote on a slip of paper, and they go off and vote. In the eventuality that they divide evenly on some issue, 5,000 for and 5,000 against, they look at your ballot and count it in. This has never yet happened; they have never yet had occasion to open your ballot. (A single master also might commit himself to letting his slave decide any issue concerning him about which he, the master, was absolutely indifferent.)
  9. They throw your vote in with theirs. If they are exactly tied your vote carries the issue. Otherwise it makes no difference to the electoral outcome.

The question is: which transition from case 1 to case 9 made it no longer the tale of a slave?”

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Are we all Slaves? (excerpt from Robert Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia)

  1. I hope you don’t think i’m trying to be edgy or a troll, but why is hierarchy bad? Some people are inherently better than others and i don’t see how society would function if there were no leaders.I can’t really take the analogy of the slave that anarchists use too seriously, because they assume there is such a thing as not being what they(and i presume you) call a “slave”.Also, what are your thoughts on nationalism, race, gender dynamics and religion?

    • I don’t think that hierarchy is bad. I believe, like you, that there are differences among people. People people are more beautiful, more intelligent, and stronger than others. What I mean with ‘slavery’ is enforced bondage. When you are not allowed the freedom to disengage yourself from other people, then you are a slave. In this case: since the state is enforced (with violence) upon us, we are slaves of the state. When people are allowed to live in freedom, hierarchies will naturally develop. I believe that freedom means the responsibility to take charge of your own lives, and that the truly autonomous person naturally maintains a distance between himself and his fellow men.

      My thoughts on nationalism, race, gender dynamics, and religion? Those are very broad questions. I don’t know how to answer such a question. Maybe you should narrow down your question more. What do you think about all this?

    • I don’t think that hierarchy is bad. I believe, like you, that there are differences among people. Some people are more beautiful, more intelligent, and stronger than others. What I mean with ‘slavery’ is that it is enforced bondage. When you are not allowed the freedom to disengage yourself from other people, then you are a slave. In this case: since the state is enforced (with violence) upon us, we are slaves of the state. When people are allowed to live in freedom, hierarchies will naturally develop. I believe that freedom means the responsibility to take charge of your own lives, and that the truly autonomous person naturally maintains a distance between himself and his fellow men.

      My thoughts on nationalism, race, gender dynamics, and religion? Those are very broad questions. I don’t know how to answer such a question. Maybe you should narrow down your question more. What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s